Thursday, March 15, 2012

Week 9 Reflection

The creation of the heavens is explained differently and interpreted differently in every culture.  A myth is a traditional/cultural story that has been passed either by word of mouth, written down, or pictures, from person to person over time.  Mythical thinking differs from scientific thinking by showing that there is more than one way of interpreting something.  It makes you think about the possibility of a higher being rather than just evolution.  There were some similarities between a few myths, like how there was at least one god and man was created in the image of that god.  Some reasons for these similarities and differences is because as humans,  we tend to think somewhat alike, but interpret everything in a different way, be it ever so slightly.  These myths mean that humans could have possibly been created rather than just evolve from a species that still exists today.

Creation Myths


Questions

1.      In all these stories, how do the gods behave?
2.      What is the place of human beings in these stories?
3.      How does God behave toward Man?
Omaha Creation Myth:
1. The god just gives the people what they want, which was a place to live.  The god behaves charitably.
2. The human beings were lost and didn’t know where they belonged.  They were obviously not as glorious as the god or they would have made themselves a place to live.
3. He behaves as though he wants to help the people he created.
Pawnee Creation Myth:
1. Mother Corn behaves very powerfully.
2. They are ever indebted to Mother Corn.  They weren’t anything before she created them.
3. She is very commanding toward her people, but also very protective.  She wants to help them in every way she can.
An African Cosmogony:
1. The god in this story behaved very sickly.  He vomited everything up that was created and after that didn’t do much.
2. Humans came from the god that vomited them up, so the place of humans in this myth is to help keep the earth clean.
3. He helps man to learn how to create fire.  He wants to help them.

Sunday, March 11, 2012

Week 8 Reflection

Carson helped America realize the harmful effects their pesticides and other harmful chemicals were having on the environment.  She is very matter of fact and really makes you think.  She is very witty and funny.  The fable shows how people can impact their environment without even knowing it.
The Easter Island society became a wasteland from a natural paradise because as society gained progression and moved forward, they were unaware of the impact they were having on their natural resources.  The statues show how the Islanders didn't really care about their environment, only to show off to the other tribes.  This story can be compared to our society in many ways because we are becoming more and more unaware of how much we are using our resources each year.  If we don't be careful and start being more preservative with our resources, we are going to end up like the Easter Island society.

Week 7 Reflection

The polar extremes Abbey discusses are either being such an environmentalist fanatic or not caring about the parks at all and wanting to purposefully ruin them.  His writing style is very informal and makes the reader feel like they can relate well.  He is very funny, so I do enjoy his writing style quite a lot.  I feel like I can relate well to him and that we understand each other.

Week 6 Reflection

The argument in the text "Wildlife in American Culture" is that society is having a very negative impact on the environment.  I think that Leopold is right because we really could be better about preserving our natural resources.  We need to be doing all we can to help save our earth.  I am not a hunter, but I think a hunter would still think that although we need to help preserve our natural resources, we should still be able to hunt and use the animals for food.  I think that people from the East Coast wouldn't care about our natural resources as much because they don't have as many mountains or wide open spaces there.  They wouldn't care as much because they haven't seen how beautiful the earth can be if we don't pollute it.

Tuesday, March 6, 2012

A Fable for Tomorrow


Page 370.  The general argument made by Rachel Carson in her work A Fable for Tomorrow is that if humankind is not careful, we could lose all the beauty around us.  More specifically, Carson suggests that no one can take this beauty from us, but ourselves.  She writes, “No witchcraft, no enemy action had silenced the rebirth of new life in this stricken world.  The people had done it themselves” (p. 371).  In this passage, Carson I suggesting that unless society starts to take better care of the earth, all of the beautiful things we enjoy could simply disappear and we wouldn’t know what to do to get them back.  In conclusion, it is Carson’s belief that we need to take care of the earth we live in to enjoy it’s beauty.
            In my view, Carson is right because no one is going to take care of the earth or destroy the earth except for our society because we are the ones that make decisions to either help or harm the earth.  For example, we can help the earth by either carpooling or riding our bikes more often instead of buying and driving inefficient fueled vehicles that cause carbon monoxide poisoning in the air.  Although Carson might object that it’s not too late to turn back from this point, I maintain that if everyone starts making healthier decisions for our earth, we can turn back and make the earth a better place.  Therefore, I conclude that making the earth a better place for everyone, including the earth itself, should be everyone’s number one priority because without the earth, we couldn’t survive.

Easter's End


Page 425.  The general point made by Jared Diamond in his work Easter’s End is that if societies use up their resources, they become extinct.  More specifically, Diamond suggests that if American society doesn’t learn from the Easter Islanders mistakes, we will end up like them.  He writes, “unlike the Easter Islanders, we have histories of the past –information that can save us” (p. 431).  In this passage, Diamond is suggesting that we can save ourselves and learn from past mistakes of others.  In conclusion, it is Diamond’s belief that we can save ourselves from the fate of cultures like the Easter Islanders if we use our resources wisely and start living differently.
            In my view, Diamond is right because society needs to realize how wasteful we are being of our resources and start coming up with a plan to save our earth.  For example, if everyone were to start realizing that we don’t need buildings everywhere and we don’t need our inefficiently fueled cars as much as everyone thinks we do, our earth would start to somewhat recover slowly.  Although Diamond might object that people won’t resist this change, I maintain that although people will resist, the change will be well worth it to continue our society.  Therefore, I conclude that we need to learn from past mistakes and society needs to start making better decisions to help our earth recover before it is too late.

Sunday, March 4, 2012

The Hudson River School


The Hudson River School started in 1825 and ended in 1880.  The purpose of the Hudson River School was to help young artists view the landscape of America and romanticize it.  Some of the unique characteristics in the paintings created at the HRS were the many trees, open fields, waterfalls, mountains, dramatic sunsets, and especially the spiritual light coming from above.  There weren’t any animals in any of the paintings because if the artists wanted to romanticize the landscape, they needed to show how beautiful and safe it was, rather than how scary and dark it can really be.  Almost all of the paintings were very bright and happy.  The paintings made you feel like you would feel much better if you were to spend more time in nature rather than in the city.  Europeans did not have any open wilderness at this time such as America had, and Europeans envied that.  They wanted to be able to live in the free, open air as Americans did and still do today in some cases.  After these paintings were viewed by Europeans, they would want to move to America.  The settings of the paintings looked very realistic, but also looked unrealistic because it was so bright and beautiful with all of the waterfalls, open space, and vivid light.  Some Europeans didn’t believe these were realistic because of those things.  They didn’t believe such beautiful places could exist.
            Autumn – On the Hudson River by Jasper Francis Cropsey is a painting created at the HRS in 1860.  The HRS really got it’s name from this painting.  It is one of the most famous because of that reason.  Cropsey taught himself to draw while younger in his life (Belson & Henderson, 2011).  He specialized in autumn landscapes so he used many bright colors as well as a lot of light.  He mostly portrayed nature through this season.  His work reflected the ideals of the HRS and Romanticism in the American West by always showing the sunny side of things, literally.  None of his paintings are dark or dreary, and all have very bright colors because he chose to mostly paint autumn landscapes.
            Another piece from the HRS is Rainy Season in the Tropics by Frederic Church.  He became Thomas Cole’s only pupil at age 18, and soon thereafter started exhibiting his work (Belson & Henderson, 2011).  He loved doing paintings of the arctic as well as the tropics.  Church portrayed nature as very bright but calm.  He loved doing paintings that had anything to do with water and he enjoyed that atmosphere of being around waterfalls, lakes, or rain.  Church’s work reflected the connection with the HRS and Romanticism in the American West by showing all of the different water areas.  He loved to show the waterfalls and the lakes and how beautiful the surrounding environment was.
            Thomas Moran’s Chasm of the Colorado was painted from 1873 to 1874.  He is most famously known for doing pieces on the Rocky Mountains as well as Yellowstone (Wikipedia, 2012).  He loved doing pieces that were of canyons or mountains right after it had rained or just started to rain.  He did many elaborate things with clouds, making his pieces look very realistic in that aspect.  To romanticize the American West, Moran used very natural colors to help emphasize how important nature should be to everyone.  He wanted to show how beneficial it could be for you to just go out in the wilderness by yourself and just enjoy the beauty around you.
            In conclusion, because of these paintings, people from Europe wanted badly to come to America.  If they wanted so badly to come to America and see these beautiful landscapes, we should want to protect them as much as we can.  “Find…encouragement and inspiration in precisely the present condition of things, and cherish it with the fondness and enthusiasm of lovers” (Allen & Almonte, 2009, p. 354).  This means that although we should be happy with the current circumstances, meaning how our landscapes are now, we should want to protect them and better them as much as possible.  The painters from the HRS Romanticized the American West because of our beautiful landscapes.  We should want to continue that romanticism and keep them looking as beautiful as we can.



References
Belson, J., & Henderson, R.  (2011).  Retrieved March 1, 2012 from:  http://whitemountainart.com/biographies/bio_jfc.htm
Belson, J., & Henderson, R.  (2011).  Retrieved March 1, 2012 from:  http://whitemountainart.com/biographies/bio_fec.htm
Wikipedia.  (2012).  Retrieved March 1, 2012 from:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Moran
Allen, P., & Almonte, P.  (2009).  That is the question.  United States of America:  Pearson.