The significance of the Peach Blossom in the culture is that the Peach Blossom represents life and happiness. In the poem, I think it represents these things as well, but also represents the beauty of simplicity. I've realized in my own life that if I make more time for more important things, my life becomes much more simple rather than always worrying about big things in my life. Life is really about being happy with the little things.
My footprint for the Ecological Quiz was 4.92 Earths. I could lighten my footprint by buying more organic foods and using compost piles rather than a garbage disposal. I could not travel so much by car or plane, I could ride my bike and walk more places, especially when it is nicer weather outside.
In the selections from Walden reading, these were three quotes I found and related to.
1. "What people say you cannot do, you try and find that you can" (page 351). I really like this quote because when people tell you that you can't do something, it gives you even more motivation to prove them wrong and show them that you can do what they said you couldn't. I've realized this in my own life and it always turns out that I can do the things that people say I couldn't do. It makes me feel more accomplished too when I complete those tasks. I thank the people silently that said I couldn't something, because they were my motivation to complete that event.
2. "Some things are really necessaries of life in some circles, the most helpless and diseased, which in others are luxuries merely, and in others still are entirely unknown" (page. 352). This quote really got me thinking about how much we take for granted in the United States. We have so many freedoms and luxuries that so many other countries don't get to enjoy. Many cultures don't even know about the existence of such freedoms or technology that we have here today. It made me really grateful for everything I have and made me appreciate the simple things in life, as well as the bigger things I don't really even think about.
3. "A man is rich in proportion to the number of things which he can afford to let alone" (page. 360). The reason I liked this quote so much was because it made me realize how many things we really don't need. Society and the media makes everyone think that we need all of the newest and most hi-tech things there are out there, but in reality, they just make our lives more complicated and more problematic. For example, everyone wants and iPhone, but the second you buy it, they come out with a newer "cooler" version of it, making you need to save up all your money all over again. We don't always need the newest thing out there, because if we try to simplify our lives rather than focus on trying to just get more "stuff," our lives will be much better off.
Sunday, February 26, 2012
Week 4 Reflection
Polemic: Industrial Tourism and the National Parks
Page 385. The general point made by Edward Abbey in his
work Polemic: Industrial Tourism and the
National Parks is that we need to take better care of the national parks to
preserve their beauty. More
specifically, Abbey argues that the tourists that visit the parks need to be
more aware of how they are affecting the park depending on what they are doing
or how they are camping. He writes, “campgrounds
where I used to putter around reading three-day-old newspapers full of lies and
watermelon seeds have now been consolidated into one master campground that
looks, during the busy season, like a suburban village” (p. 387). In this passage, Abbey is suggesting that
most of the modern-day tourists are ruining the national parks with all their
motor vehicles and their way of camping when they come to visit the national
parks. In conclusions, it is Abbey’s
belief that if we don’t ban motor vehicles and paved roads from national parks,
they will be destroyed and future generations will not be able to enjoy them.
In my view, Abbey is right because
many of the modern-day tourists only do things in ways in which they are
comfortable. For example, I have been
camping many times in my life, but only once have I ever camped in a tent,
without flushable toilets and no electricity whatsoever. People only do what they feel comfortable
with. Although Abbey might object that his
idea might drive some people away from camping, I maintain that it would, but
only the people that were really against going without all of their high-tech
gadgets. Therefore, I conclude that we
do need to take better care of our national parks in whatever way possible so
that our posterity will be able to enjoy them.
Sunday, February 19, 2012
Wildlife in American Culture
Page 372. The general point made by Aldo Leopold in his
work Wildlife in American Culture is
that modern society with all its new technology and inventions, is having a
very negative impact on the environment.
More specifically, Leopold suggests that society is continually
destroying parts of the environment when we really don’t need to. He writes, “the conquest of nature by machine
has led to much unnecessary destruction of resources” (p. 372). In this passage, Leopold is suggesting that
society as a whole can do a much better job with being aware of what we truly
need to take from the environment and what we need to preserve. In conclusion, it is Leopold’s belief that “we
shall achieve conservation when…the destructive use of land becomes unethical”
(p. 372).
In my view, Leopold is right because
we really could be better about preserving our natural resources to help save
the environment a little bit more. For
example, we use a lot of paper and water as a society. If everyone were to recycle every possible
thing they could and to try to take shorter showers, turn off the water while
brushing their teeth, and other things like that, it would help the environment
so much. Riding your bike would also
help a lot to reduce pollution of the air we breathe every day. Although Leopold might object that people don’t
care about the environment because of the current world we live in, I maintain
that everyone wants to help protect the earth we live on but they just aren’t sure how to
do that. Therefore, I conclude that if
there was more awareness put out there about the environment and how our
actions effect it, people would be better about doing things to help the
environment rather than cause more damage that what has already been done.
Introduction & Peach Blossom
Introduction
(Page 341). This passage was about how influential man
and civilization in general can be on nature.
This really made me start thinking about how although people are
separate from nature, we are a part of it just as much. We influence nature so much, and we need to
start taking better care of it. This
made me think of one of my favorite quotes, “We did not inherit the earth from
our parents, but we are borrowing it from our children.” I really like this quote because it makes me
want to take better care of the earth for my children. In this passage, the quote “their cultures
maintained a sense of nature as intimately connected with who we are” (p 342)
really made me think of how if our society was more connected to nature and had
it as a sense of how we became who we are today, we would want to take better
care of our earth.
Peach Blossom
(Page 344). This poem depicts a fisherman travelling down
a stream where he finds a cave. He goes into
the cave and discovers a small village of people who live simple and ordinary
lives, but are very happy. They had
“lost all connection with the outside world” (p. 344). I think that the moral of the story here, is
that everyone can be happy if they go looking for it. Being happy is achieved by simplifying your
life, in whatever way you see possible.
People in today’s society need to recognize this and not stress over the
little things in life. American culture
is probably one of the biggest cultures that need to simplify. A lot of other cultures in the East, like
places of Africa and India, lead very simple lives. They are much happier there because they are
more aware of themselves and the world around them. They feel connected to everything and are
happier because of it.
Friday, February 10, 2012
Reading Quiz #2
Reading
literature can help society better understand and connect to other
cultures. Mario Vargas Llosa writes, “we
share as human beings, what remains common in all of us under the broad range
of differences that separate us. Nothing
better protects human being against the stupidity of prejudice, racism,
religious or political sectarianism…that men and women of all nations and
places are essentially equal, and that only injustice sows among them
discrimination, fear, and exploitation” (p. 40). What he means by this is that every human
being, no matter what race, religion, gender, or culture, is all equal and that
one can only become connected to others of a different race, religion, etc. is
by reading literature. That is the only
possibly way one can become aware of the world around him.
On the other hand, Laura Bohannan thought
that everyone viewed the world as well as stories the same way no matter what
culture or religion. However, she also
proves the point that only through literature can society understand one
another by finding out that she is wrong about how she thinks of other cultures
once she tells a tribe in Africa the story of Hamlet by Shakespeare. At
the beginning of her story, she thinks “human nature is pretty much the same
the whole world over” (p. 29). She
realizes she is wrong by the end of telling her story because the African tribe
was so confused on so many different parts of the story. They didn’t view the story the same way she
did, like thinking that two years was much too long for a widow to mourn, or
that it is very acceptable for the brother to marry the deceased brother’s
wife. She realizes at the end that only
through reading literature and thinking about how other cultures might view the
world, stories, or poetry differently, that that is the only way the whole
world can be connected. Through
education of other cultures, religions, etc. and by reading can society
understand one another even through their differences.
An example that proves the point
that only through reading can people become connected is the example of how
differently the story of Cinderella
is viewed differently in the United States rather than in China. In Cinderella
in the United States, the Fairy Godmother is an actual person who grants wishes
to Cinderella. However, in China, the
Fairy Godmother is a coy fish who grants wishes to Cinderella. In China, the coy fish is a symbol of good
luck. If society didn’t have literature,
no one would be able to understand how cultures would view the exact same story
so differently. Because society has
literature though, everyone feels connected because each culture is trying to
understand the beliefs, ideas, and opinions of another culture in which they
are reading about.
These two articles, Shakespeare in the Bush by Laura
Bohannan and Why Literature? by Mario
Vargas Llosa, are connected because only through reading literature can the
whole world understand each other.
Without literature, nothing connects us to one another because everyone
is so different and unique. Each
culture, religion, political group, etc. will always have different opinions
and views on everything under the sun.
However, if everyone makes an effort to learn from literature and
understand the other person’s point of view, society will feel more connected
as a whole.
Through literature, people won’t feel as
alone as they did before reading. They
will feel they have a better understanding of another person’s culture because
of the literature they have read on that specific subject of that culture’s
beliefs. Through understanding other’s
culture, people become more aware of themselves and better understand
themselves because they have learned something new about someone else. Therefore, reading literature can help
society better understand and connect to cultures around the world, including
their own.
Sunday, February 5, 2012
Education by Poetry
Page 48. The general point made by Robert Frost in his
work Education by Poetry is that you
can become close to poetry in only two different ways. More specifically, Frost suggests that these
ways are reading poetry or writing poetry, but only if you have such a desire
to do so. He writes, “ the person who
gets close enough to poetry, he is going to know more about the word belief
than anybody else knows, even in religion nowadays…every time a poem is written…it
is written not by cunning, but by belief” (page 50). In this passage, Frost is suggesting that
only by experiencing poetry, whether it be through reading or writing, but by
experiencing it is the only way we can come to know and understand poetry. In conclusion, it is Frost’s belief that
poetry can only be experienced and truly understood by reading or writing it.
In my view, Frost is right because
you can never really understand something, whether it be an experience or a
piece of text/poetry, unless you really go through the process of trying to
understand it, by reading about it or writing about it then truly thinking
about what you have just learned. For
example, you can’t really fully understand someone who went through The Great
Depression unless you either listen to them (reading) or you talk to them about
what they went through (writing).
Although Frost might object that everyone can understand poetry, I maintain
that everyone can if they really think about and try to have their own
interpretation and opinion of it. Have
ideas about the text of what they are reading.
Therefore, I conclude that poetry can be understood by anyone if they
just learn to have their own opinions and beliefs about what they are reading
or writing.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
